StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

N.T. Wright New Perspective of Paul - Research Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "N.T. Wright New Perspective of Paul" focuses on the critical analysis of the N.T. Wright's new perspective of Paul on covenantal justification. Each generation produces several gifted scholars, several of which gain a significant amount of popularity…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.8% of users find it useful
N.T. Wright New Perspective of Paul
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "N.T. Wright New Perspective of Paul"

A Critical Analysis of N.T. Wright New Perspective of Paul on Covenantal Justification A Critical Analysisof N.T. Wright New Perspective of Paul on Covenantal Justification Introduction Each generation produces a number of gifted scholars, a number of which gain a significant amount of popularity and impact significantly on Biblical studies. Nicholas Wright is among these men having garnered a significant amount of acclaim and acceptance for the work that he has done in New Testament theology and most especially for the work that he has done with regard to Apostle Paul. His influence, not only in Pauline but also on Biblical studies as a whole and stretches across denominational divides impacting on Roman Catholics, Anglicans as well as Methodists and Presbyterians1. Being a self admitted proponent of a number of aspects that result from the New Perspectives put forward by Paul, Wright distinctly shares a number of similarities with fellow advocates E.P Sanders and James Dunn however, Wrights arguments carry their own weight and unique undertone. In recent times however, Wright has received a large amount of criticism especially with regard to the doctrine of justification2. This is the issue which will be examined in this discussion and will be addressed by examining the origin and development of the New Perspective of Paul,2) Justification in N.T. Wright and its Relation with the Adamic, Abrahamic and New Covenant and 3) Carry out a Critical Analysis on NT Wright Covenantal Justification from Reformed Scholars. By the end of this paper, it is hoped that the reader will have a clear understanding of the weakness of the covenantal view approach to justification by contrasting strengths within the disputed justification. The Origin and Development of the New Perspective of Paul In recent years, there has been a distinct change in the views touching on Pauline Theology with a growing number of evangelicals endorsing what is being referred to as the New Perspective on Paul which makes a significant departure from the Reformation focus on justification based on faith alone3. Some of the most popular spokesmen for this new view are E.P Sanders and James D.G Dunn. While having slight differences in the manner in which they defend the New Perspective, all of these scholars have seemingly adopted an argument referred to as covenantal nominism which essentially provides a role to salvation to the works of Moses’ law4. a. E.P Sanders Among the numerous contributions to Pauline theology E. P Sanders stands as one of the most distinct. Heavily influenced by historical-Critical ideologies, Sanders argued that Paul’s Christology is distinctly unclear and conflicting. For instance on Rom 1:3-4 Sanders argues that while the reader of the passage might be led to believe that Jesus had been designated to be the Son of God and that he was designated only at the moment of his resurrection. This later becomes an adoptionist Christology. Instead, he contends, Jesus was adopted by God as his son and was not born as His Son5. Sanders therefore concludes that from Paul’s writings, it is impossible for one to derive from these letters anything that resembles a single doctrine of Jesus Christ. Sanders often refused to acknowledge the apostolic framework of the canonical gospels arguing that there is no clear knowledge of who wrote them; indeed while Matthew, Mark and Luke did live, there is no one that can provide proof that they did write the gospels6. Sanders was heavily influenced by George Foot Moore whose core focus was Paul’s understanding of Judaism where he argued that it was wrong7. Paul’s focus was more on individual as opposed to national salvation and he neglected to have an understanding of aspects such as human repentance as well as forgiveness which reveals that Paul entirely missed the significance of the law of Judaism. This factor led to what was seen as an inaccurate reflection of Judaism within the New Testament that has continued throughout the centuries8. b. James D.G Dunn Dunn operated his assertions separately from any consideration for any inspiration from the canonical books of the New Testament. In much the same way as Sanders, Dunn was heavily impacted by historical-critical theories and also asserts that canonical gospels cannot be a good foundation for the formulation of theology on Jesus. This is because there is no evidence that firsthand information from Jesus which can provide this basis9. In terms of the New Perspective, Dunn presents a new assumption, praising Sanders for his view that Protestants allowing a Lutheran focus on justification of faith. He contends that a first century depiction of Judaism was a gross understatement which in turn helped to increase on the levels of anti-Semitism that many Christians held10. Indeed for Dunn and many who hold fast to the New perspective on Paul, the old perspective driven by Martin Luther and his Reformation supporters was directly responsible for the spread of anti-Semitism that led to the genocide of Jews that was carried out in the 1940s by the Nazi11. Justification in N.T. Wright and its Relation with the Adamic, Abrahamic and New Covenants a. Adamic Covenant NT Wright points to the manner in which Adam functions theologically within the Old Testament and considers the extent to which the historical Adam is core to the creation of the Adamic Covenant12. Wright considers how the aspect of creation and covenant become clearer when the two are brought together. The promises that were made to Adam were also told to Abraham and were fulfilled in the new covenant13. He also argues that God essentially called on Abraham to undo the sin that had been committed by Adam. This is close to the heart of the interpretation that Paul has of Genesis; here the God who was responsible for creation is also the one who created the covenant and His word through the prophet or servant will rescue and at the same time deliver his people from the enemy14. The covenant is also present to solve the problems that occurred within creation and therefore God called upon Abraham to solve the problem that Adam and evil had created. On the other hand, creation is brought forward to solve the problems that occurred within the covenant. When Israel finds itself facing any type of challenge and the promises of the covenant are not coming to pass, the people can cry to the covenant God as He is the creator15. b. Abrahamic Covenant Sabbath, Food, Nation, Land and Torah were the major components of the Abrahamic covenant. Similar to all world views, these symbols helped to provide Israel with a distinct sense of identity as well as boundaries that made it clear who was and was not among God’s people16. Wright argues that story, symbol and praxis all focus on Israel’s scriptures which in turn helped to reveal a world view that was at its heart very simple. Out of this covenant grew the basic beliefs that Israel had which were monotheism, election and eschatology17. Two themes were key in the Abrahamic covenant; sacrifice and suffering. Sacrifice here includes regular worship, pilgrimages and national feasts not only carried out among the participants among the people that God had chosen but also carried out to serve a symbolic restoration18. Suffering on the other hand served to act as a sort of prelude to what was seen as God’s climactic action. Wright concurs that quite a number of Jews in the first century placed too much focus on the concept of collective suffering for what was seen as national sin. For Wright, these are the core elements of the Jewish view of Jesus’ day19. Wright argues that Jesus had full understanding of himself as the one who God was using to fulfill each of His promises to Israel. The differences between Jesus’ beliefs and those of other Jews was simply that he believes that each of the things that were believed to be coming true in and through himself. He therefore concludes that Jesus essentially saw himself as a prophet, Israel’s messiah and the overall reflection of Yahweh20. b. New Covenant Here , Wright considers how through baptism individuals are able to enter into a new covenant with God. This is the fulfillment of th promise that God had made of doing a new thing. The New Testament is therefore an affirmation of the importance of the baptism that John the Baptist went through as this was the beginning of Jesus’ personal ministry21. However, Jesus picks up the language of baptism and in Mark 10:39 he speaks to the disciples with regard to being baptized with the baptism that he went through, essentially referring to something more than water. Wright also argues that in the baptism of Jesus, there was also elements of death and resurrection and all the many layers of meaning that were found to be present with the baptism emerged again on the event of the death and resurrection of Jesus22. 4. Critical Analysis on N.T. Wright Covenantal Justification from Reformed Scholars a. John Piper NT Wright’s approach to Paul has been met with significant challenge from John Piper who completely disagrees with the notion that the discussions on the history of the Church and especially understanding Paul have been wrong23. He argues that the framework provided by Wright with regard to interpreting the New Testament as well as understanding of justification would only work to distort understanding of future generations. In addition, this thought could also do away with the original intent that the writers of the New Testament. In this regard, Piper calls for caution with regard to new interpretations of the Bible and to only support view of justification that is derived from the Bible24. Piper contends that the overall subject matter of justification by book is a serious one and there is therefore a need to consider that there is a significant amount that is riding on this particular truth as on any truth contained in the Bible25. Piper’s assessment of Wright’s assertions is often unflinching and he constantly posits that he is unable to see how the biblical doctrine of justification will be successful as he argues that it is not a compelling and strong retelling of what exactly Saint Paul said. Instead, Wright’s arguments will most likely only cause a significant amount of confusion within the church to a point where there will be a need for clarity26. b. D. A. Carson Carson views NT Wright’s assertion on justification as a view through an ecclesial lense and not simply God’s justice. He contends that while Wright is not wrong in his arguments , he does leave out a significant portion of what the Bible talks about such as God’s wrath27. He contends that for Wright the work of the cross is external while there numerous instances in the Old Testament God’s anger is mentioned. Wright therefore does not see the core of the offense28. On God’s justice, Carson asserts that the constant reiteration of the line between good and evil goes down the middle of each human being is a fair assertion however while Wright’s point is well represented in the scriptures, he is wrong in the manner that he treats it as if it is the only point simply rule out a number of Biblical texts that can also add weight to the discussion29. c. Mark Serfried Serfried puts forward two distinct elements in critiquing Wright. First, he asserts that Wright often engages in a type of idealism that goes so far as to idealize the virtues of faithfulness, salvation as well as the distinct enhancement of the human condition, aspects of representation and the role that a covenant and Israel play in biblical history. This assertion creates far more dilemmas than it provides solutions to30. Serfried also sets forth a thematic reading of the Old testament which outlines God-Man-Christ and Response by Faith over a historical approach. Here Serfried argues that the reason why the latter approach failed was as a result of the assigned narrative to address human beings in the present31. As a result Wright has to resort to a type of moral idealism as a way in which to clearly address the gap. One of the biggest problems for this approach is the fact that it makes the attempt to reduce the Scripture to one single vision of God and the manner in which God carries out his activities in the World32. 5. Conclusion At the beginning of this study, questions were raised regarding the origin and development of the New Perspective of Paul, Justification in N.T. Wright and its Relation with the Adamic, Abrahamic and New Covenant and 3also how NT Wright Covenantal Justification is perceived by some scholars. First, there has been a significant change in the manner that Pauline theology is examined with many evangelicals turning to the New Perspective. E.P Sanders is one of these scholars and was heavily influenced by historical-critical ideologies. Sanders contends that Jesus has been adopted by God and was not born as His own son as has been argued. Sanders also refuses the apostolic framework of the canonical gospels. James Dunn is another scholar who holds fast to this New Perspective arguing that first century depiction of Judaism was a big exaggeration that might have led to the genocide that was carried out by the Nazi in the 1940s. Second in considering the justification of NT Wright and the Adamic Covenant, Wright contends that creation and the covenant become clearer in the instance that they are brought together with the promises that were told to Adam essentially being fulfilled in the new covenant. With regard to the Abrahamic covenant, Wright argues that aspects such as story and symbol continue to focus on Israel’s scriptures which the large number of Jews still continue to hold on to. In the new covenant, Wright essentially contends that Jesus had a full understanding of himself as the fulfillment of the promise that God had made with regard to doing a new thing. Third, John Piper. D.A Carson and Mark Serfried offer arguments against this New Perspective arguing that the framework that has been set forward by Wright with regard to offering an interpretation of the New Testament will only work to create confusion. Caron also contends that Wright’s arguments leave out a significant portion of the Bible with regard to God’s justice. Serfried on the other hand criticizes the idealism that Wright uses in his arguments. Third, John Piper. D.A Carson and Mark Serfried offer arguments against this New Perspective arguing that the framework that has been set forward by Wright with regard to offering an interpretation of the New Testament will only work to create confusion. Carson also contends that Wright’s arguments leave out a significant portion of the Bible with regard to God’s justice. Serfried on the other hand criticizes the idealism that Wright uses in his arguments. None of the statements put forward by Carson, Serfried and Piper suggest that the arguments stated by Wright are wrong simply that they are selective in nature. Indeed they contend that this New Perspective does have some strength in the Bible and that it does present a novel way of considering Paul and the way in which he argued about the covenant. In conclusion, what one can perceive from this discussion on the New Perspective is a suggestive model with some aspects(such as examining how the new covenant is a fulfillment of the promises made to Adam and Abraham) but not a set down view of how the works of Paul should be considered. Both Interpretations of the Bible should be embraced if the world hopes to be able to face the challenges of today. Bibliography Beale, Gregory, K. “Review Essay: The Overstated ‘New’ Perspective?” BBR 19 (2009): 85-94 Bird, Michael F. The Saving Righteousness of God: Studies on Paul, Justification, and the New Perspective. Milton Keynes, UK: Wipf & Stock, 2007 Campbell, Douglas. The Quest for Paul’s Gospel: A Suggested Strategy. London; New York: T. & T. Clark, 2005 Cross, F. L, and Elizabeth A Livingstone. Dictionary of the Christian Church. Peabody, MA; Edinburgh: Hendrickson Publishers, 2007. Dunn, James D. G. The New Perspective on Paul. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2008. Dunn, James. “The Justice of God,” in The New Perspective on Paul. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2008. Francis Watson. Paul, Judaism, and the Gentiles: Beyond the New Perspective. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2007. Garlington, Don. “The New Perspective on Paul: An Appraisal Two Decades Later,” Criswell Theological Review 2 (2005): 17-19 Kim, Yung Suk. A Theological Introduction to Pauls Letters: Exploring a Threefold Theology of Paul. (New York: Cascade Books,  2011) Kok, Jacobus. “The New Perspectives on Paul and its implication for ethics and mission.” Acta Patristica, 21(2010):3 Rainbow, Paul A. The Way of Salvation: The Role of Christian Obedience in Justification. Bletchley, UK; Wipf & Stock, 2005. Smith, Jay, E. “The New Perspective on Paul: A Select and Annotated Bibliography,” Criswell Theological Review 2 (2005): 91-93111 VanLandingham, Chris. Judgment & Justification in Early Judaism and the Apostle Paul. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2006. Venema, Cornelis P. Getting the Gospel Right: Assessing the Reformation and New Perspectives on Paul. Edinburgh; Carlisle, PA: Banner of Truth Trust, 2006. Venema, Cornelis P.“What Did Saint Paul Really Say? N.T. Wright and the New Perspective(s) on Paul.” In By Faith Alone: Answering the Challenges to the Doctrine of Justification, edited by Gary L. W. Johnson and Guy Prentiss Waters. Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, 2006. Waters, Guy Prentiss. Justification and the New Perspectives on Paul: A Review and Response. Phillipsburg, NJ: P & R Publishing, 2004. Watson, Francis. Paul, Judaism, and the Gentiles: Beyond the New Perspective. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2007. Wright, Nicholas. T. Paul: In Fresh Perspective. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2005. Wright, Nicholas. T., and Bruce L. McCormack. “New Perspectives on Paul.” In Justification in Perspective: Historical Developments and Contemporary Challenges. Grand Rapids, MI; Edinburgh: Baker Academic; Rutherford House, 2006. Yinger, Kent L. The New Perspective on Paul: An Introduction. New York: Cascade Books, 2010. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“A Critical Analysis of N.T. Wright New Perspective of Paul on Research Paper”, n.d.)
A Critical Analysis of N.T. Wright New Perspective of Paul on Research Paper. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/religion-and-theology/1689712-a-critical-analysis-of-nt-wright-new-perspective-of-paul-on-covenantal-justification
(A Critical Analysis of N.T. Wright New Perspective of Paul on Research Paper)
A Critical Analysis of N.T. Wright New Perspective of Paul on Research Paper. https://studentshare.org/religion-and-theology/1689712-a-critical-analysis-of-nt-wright-new-perspective-of-paul-on-covenantal-justification.
“A Critical Analysis of N.T. Wright New Perspective of Paul on Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/religion-and-theology/1689712-a-critical-analysis-of-nt-wright-new-perspective-of-paul-on-covenantal-justification.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF N.T. Wright New Perspective of Paul

Biblical View of the Law from the Perspective of Paul

The paper "Biblical View of the Law from the perspective of paul" critically analyzes the major issues on the Biblical view of the law from Paul's perspective.... In this paper, the focus will be on the perceptions of one man who was a law expert—not only the Jewish law but also the Roman law and at the same time converted to Christianity— paul the Apostle.... When paul was arrested after his conversion, he presented himself before Agrippa and confessed how he had been a Pharisee from childhood....
9 Pages (2250 words) Research Paper

God's Plan and Paul's Vision

Wright argues that the Christian Church, particularly those confessions which belong to Protestantism has interpreted the teaching of paul the Apostle in the wrong way, making emphasis on the points that he did not consider to be important or those which contradict his point of view.... Wright engages legal discourse of the first century Common Era in order to explain the peculiarities that letters of paul hold and how they should be understood correctly.... In order to prove that the author explains the message that is conveyed by the Pauline letters and develops positions that are currently referred to as the new perspective....
6 Pages (1500 words) Book Report/Review

Left and Right Perspectives Impact on Crime

Thus left idealism analyses the crime from the perspective of social norms and class system and believes that in order to control crime from the society, the Government must improve working and economic conditions of the society.... In the paper 'Left and Right, Perspectives Impact on Crime' the author discusses the 'Realism' criminology, which has no doubt changed the new generation views on crime, today the crime is considered as a social dilemma with different socialist views adopted from Marx....
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment

Paul, the Apostle to the Gentile

In this essay "paul, the Apostle to the Gentile" this essay will try to address some questions pertinent to paul and his message.... The Spirit within paul's Jewish monotheism shows us relation of the Triune God – Father, Son and Spirit- Three divine Persons, One God, and the idea of indwelling.... Nonetheless, his experience changed the very core of his being and changes his perspective.... In the new Age, the Torah and the tabernacle (the physical manifestation of God's dwelling with humanity)....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Collection for the Poor Saints in Jerusalem

A look at the actual economic conditions of the Christian Jewish church will help clarify the context of paul's collection project.... In the paper 'Collection for the Poor Saints in Jerusalem' the author discusses the 'collection', which paul also termed as 'contribution' and 'gift' for the poor saints in Jerusalem in each of his major epistles.... The author states that a review of Pauline epistles would show that for the last five to six years of his ministry, paul seriously initiated, pleaded and gathered collections from the various Gentile Christian churches he founded for the holy ones in Jerusalem....
11 Pages (2750 words) Assignment

Visual Arts Perspective and Its Types of Meanings

The purpose of this paper is to review the literature on the kinds of meaning made possible by the use of perspective in paintings.... Various forms of perspectives employed in paintings include linear perspective and the use of perspective to transform the art plane into a transitional object.... In visual arts, perspective has been defined as 'a method of presenting an illusion of the three-dimensional world on a two-dimensional surface'....
7 Pages (1750 words) Literature review

Divergent Views on Spirituality

Therefore, it seems that there can be no hesitation that both the Old and new Testimonies teach the Protestant interpretation of legal justification.... This dissertation "Divergent Views on Spirituality" presents two divergent views on spirituality, more specifically the doctrine of justification....
34 Pages (8500 words) Dissertation

Analysis of Paul - In Fresh Perspective by Nicholas Thomas Wright

From the paper "Analysis of paul - In Fresh Perspective by Nicholas Thomas Wright" it is clear that Wright outlines the argument of his book, hence his method of approaching Apostle Paul, describing the reading of paul as 'a bit like climbing a mountain'.... In the preface, Wright outlines the argument of his book, hence his method of approaching the Apostle Paul, describing the reading of paul as 'a bit like climbing a mountain'.... As stated by Wright, the first chapter, paul's World, paul's Legacy, is intended to serve as a general introduction , which not only sets the scene for the following ones, but also, and perhaps more importantly, introduces his method of understanding paul's thought, namely the narrative study of Pauline texts....
6 Pages (1500 words) Book Report/Review
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us